Thursday, 29 June 2017

Doctors Surgical Strikes















Posted by at
Labels: ,

Friday, 9 June 2017

What is the difference between Clinical Research Organization & Contract Research Organization

Due to the increasing costs of managing the research internally and focus on core competencies, many of the pharmaceutical companies have come up with the idea of outsourcing their Discovery Development, Per-clinical Trails and Post-Clinical trials and Legal Processes to players who specialize in these areas. Please note that the forte of the pharmaceutical companies vary and hence the outsourced activities also could change accordingly. Like Novartis is known to have taken a decision not to outsource the discovery services where they opine that they have the core competence.
A Contract Research Organization is a company that is capable of taking up all or some of the activities in the pharma-biotech value chain. Example: Wuxi Apptech
However some of these companies have specialized in specific areas like:
Discovery and Development Services: GVK BIO
There are some companies that specialize in Clinical Trails. They work on both animals and human beings (volunteers) to finalize the pre-clinical and post-clinical trails. Example: Quintiles
PS: However owing to continuous changes in the geo-politics and the requirements of the companies, the differences are blurring between these companies.

While contract research organizations can span the entire pharma pipeline from drug discovery to clinical trials and beyond, a clinical research company mostly manages clinical trials. People in the R&D business often consider clinical research management companies a subset of the broader CRO category. But those in the medical and public health sector tend to consider clinical research organizations their own species, unrelated to CROs that focus on bench work.
A contract research organization (CRO) is an organization that provides support to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device industries in the form of research services outsourced on a contract basis. A CRO may provide such services as biopharmaceutical development, biologic assay development, commercialization, preclinical research, clinical research, clinical trials management, and pharmacovigilance. CROs also support foundations, research institutions, and universities, in addition to governmental organizations (such as the NIH, EMA, etc.).
Many CROs specifically provide clinical-study and clinical-trial support for drugs and/or medical devices. CROs range from large, international full-service organizations to small, niche specialty groups.
CROs that specialize in clinical-trials services can offer their clients the expertise of moving a new drug or device from its conception to FDA/EMA marketing approval, without the drug sponsor having to maintain a staff for these services.

Regulatory aspects

Specifically pertaining to CROs providing clinical-trials services, the International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use (E6 1.20) defines a Contract Research Organization (CRO) as: "A person or an organization (commercial, academic, or other) contracted by the sponsor to perform one or more of a sponsor's trial-related duties and functions."
  • (5.2.1) A sponsor may transfer any or all of the sponsor's trial-related duties and functions to a CRO, but the ultimate responsibility for the quality and integrity of the trial data always resides with the sponsor. The CRO should implement quality assurance and quality control.
  • (5.2.2) Any trial-related duty and function that is transferred to and assumed by a CRO should be specified in writing.
  • (5.2.3) Any trial-related duties and functions not specifically transferred to and assumed by a CRO are retained by the sponsor.
  • (5.2.4) All references to a sponsor in this guideline also apply to a CRO to the extent that a CRO has assumed the trial-related duties and functions of a sponsor.

Market size and growth

There are over 1,100 CROs in the world, despite continued trends toward consolidation (many CROs are being acquired in recent times or others go out of business). It is a very fragmented industry with the top 10 controlling 56.1% of the market in 2008 and down to 55% in 2009. One estimate had the size of the market set to reach $24 billion in 2010 and set to grow at a rate of 8.5% through 2015.
However, more recent data reveal a 15.5% increase in R&D spend from 2015 to 2020.
As of 2016, the top 10 CROs by revenues are considered to be:
  1. Quintiles ($4.3B revenues in 2015)
  2. Covance ($2.5B revenues in 2014 before its acquisition by LabCorp)
  3. Parexel ($2.1B revenues in 2015/16)
  4. inVentiv Health ($2.0B revenues in 2015)
  5. Icon plc ($1.57B revenues in 2015, headquartered in Dublin, Ireland)
  6. PRA Health Sciences ($1.4B revenues in 2015)
  7. Pharmaceutical Product Development ($1.35B revenues in 2014),
  8. Charles River Laboratories ($1.4B revenues in 2015)
  9. Chiltern International Ltd. (approaching $1B revenues)
  10. INC Research (approaching $1B revenues)


Can a teenager start a clinical Research Organization?


I’d love to say YES! to this, and I fully support you. But unfortunately, the chances of it being successful are slim. A business, yes. Teenagers start them all the time. In fact, with one of the subjects at school (I don’t take), the aim is to start your own business and be as successful as possible, and pit yourself against other companies set up by other school students.

However, a Clinical Research Organisation, as good an idea as it is, is probably out of the realms. 99.99999% of them (not a precise number, but it shows the chances) are run by people with university degrees in science, and you won’t have them at high school (I think).

What you both could/should do is take a free period (i.e. drop a useless class or something), sit in the library and research it together. Talk to a professor (if you have one teaching at your school) and get them to help. Ask, and they’ll be more than willing to help, and they might even teach you how to write full-blown reports and do “proper” research. Not minimizing you and your abilities, but they might take you through the whole process. Once you get through uni (doing an appropriate course, of course), then you’ll have that edge above everyone else who wants to set one up.

Wanting to start a business is awesome. It’s a fantastic idea, especially for a teenager.

When starting a business, it’s important to have a passion for what you’ll be doing. Without this passion, you will likely give up too early. Given the fact that you and your partner share a strong interest in business and biotech, you’ve got the first requirement checked off your list: passion.
You also need access to the right resources. For instance, if you’re going to be working in a laboratory, you need the things that go in a laboratory. (As a software engineering guy, I don’t know what you’ll actually need in the laboratory … but I’m confident you do.)
One of the resources that a CRO needs is a site network. Pharmaceutical company P will come to CRO C and say (essentially):
P: “Can you conduct fast and accurate clinical trials on our new prostate cancer drug D?”
C: “Yes”
P: “Prove it.”
C: “We have a site network composed of 320 oncology clinics that specialize in prostate cancer. On average, they’re each capable of screening 10 potential trial participants per month.”
P: “Awesome. You’re hired.”
Okay, clearly that’s a super-abbreviated conversation. But you get the idea. The CRO, among other things, specializes in being the middleman between the sites and the pharmaceutical companies.
In order for your CRO to succeed, you’re going to need to figure out how to have access to a site network. Is it doable? Absolutely. Plenty of companies have figured out how to do it.
It’s up to you to decide whether you’re capable of figuring out how to do it.


How do I start a clinical research organization (CRO)?


Answer
Science is a brilliant subject to study and explore. It can lead to myriad of careers, but what is a perfect fit is the biggest question. Often students get overwhelmed by the vast area to make the right choice. Well you must know everything about a career field before following the path. Once you earn the necessary knowledge; it would become easy for you to follow the route. Clinical research is one such booming field.
If you want to enter clinical research area; a healthcare science that confirms how safe and effective drugs, equipments and diagnostic products are, it’s the perfect sector for bright and talented science candidates to get involved in. If you’ve got a degree in science, medicine, nursing or pharmacy, you could be an ideal candidate for the position of Clinical Research Associate.
This role is an excellent stepping stone in the clinical research sector, giving professionals an experience of a corporate environment and a strong connection with science. It’s a rewarding career with lots of demand – but what to follow?
CRAs can later become Clinical Trial Managers or Clinical Operations Managers, but there’s also the opportunity to take lateral steps into slightly different fields. Be inspired from some of the ICON’s own team members.

It's not that easy stuff to open a CRO as Clinical Research (CR) is totally different industry as compared to others. You can do first Market research on CRO's.
How clinical trials run?
How many years to complete drug trail?
Then you can talk with industry people who actually have set up their CROs. How did they start problems they stucked, challenges they faced & most important you should have lot of experience of handling entire trials or have good team who has lot of experience in handling clinical trials.

Firstly, to define your work scope - project management, monitoring, data management, RA, medical writing, etc.
Then, to hire your talents
Last but very very important, have clients

You'll find questions you would like to ask yourself as you go along through this process of planning to begin a CRO in sweden, and you would like to inquire over and over again because your answers are going to constantly change.
Have you ever tested your notions?
Which means your business plan looks great. Have you gone out and brought it to individuals who learn more than you do and asked Am I barking the wrong tree here?
Are you aware the competitors really, very well, and just how they price?
Otherwise, you are able to know whether your value proposition is priced properly. You can't are aware that your pricing strategy will almost certainly fly using the customer.
Are you able to negotiate deals?
They need to be win-win deals, or perhaps you don’t negotiate successfully.
How's your network?
It better be pretty deep. Many scientists I’ve spoken to in pharma haven’t spent lots of time with network building beyond their narrow scientific field. You must know people outside your field and outdoors your industry.
Does asking stupid questions bother you?
It better not. I had to overcome that a bit myself in the early days and I learned that I truly liked it. I liked asking something which I was thinking was dumb, then letting them know that I thought I was being stupid, then permitting them to inform me what you know. It was actually an enjoyable experience. I much useful stuff here that way.
Should it bother you when other people inquire stupid questions, in particular, customers?
Any particular one is tougher to overpower sometimes.
Can you hate being wrong?
I understand people like this. They get into arguments and defend their position around the smallest thing. You can't be in this way if you're testing the minds of your strategic business plan.
Does one such as the job of CEO?
Does one actually know what that job involves? It doesn't involve doing the science that you think you will get into this to do.
Did you know accounting?
I didn't offer an accounting class while attending college. In the event, you don't know accounting then start reading books because this is completely vital.
Are you prepared to take no salary and have no insurance?
Just about everyone I am aware that has started a CRO and other biopharma business adjusted via a period where they've got had no salary. One of the best ways this can be done, and I hate to really make it appear to be its this dependency kind of thing, is to get a spouse with a great job with really great insurance. It's just like this the vast majority of the time. Those who take this risk in most cases have some personal backup.

Which is the best Contract Research Organization (CRO) in India?



India is traditionally known for pharmaceutical companies like Dr Reddys and Ranbaxy. CROs have started off in the country around 2000s and owing to the strict compliance and operational issues around the industry (like the distance from cities, disposal management, need for highly skilled labor) not many people have attempted and continued in this business. However, two names have emerged as the leaders from 2007 onwards.

  1. Syngene
  2. GVK BIO

Apart from these two companies, Advenus a Tata company is also growing fast.

If you ask which company I would love to work with as a client or as a employee, I will vote for GVK Biosciences. Why? Because:

Syngene is owned by a biotech company called Biocon that does its own scientific research. It innovates its own drugs and produces medicines. Why world I want to outsource my company’s info to a company that is also a competitor company of mine? So, I strike-off the possibility of working with Syngene.
GVK BIO is based out of Hyderabad, the pharma hub of India. The company has issues but those should not stop me from doing business. Advenus is also a good option as it is backed by 100+ year old Tata Group. But, still among these two companies, I will choose GVK BIO owing their experience in the domain of Contract Research Organization segment.

How can someone start a new Research and Development organization?

I want to start a for profit research and development company one day that will develop new technology for business and consumer use. How could I find resources and talent to make that happen?



The normal approach is that a company/organization that makes products and has profits (say, Google or IBM), at some point decides to fund a long-term R&D group. Since you don't have the money, in essence you need to raise it.  This requires you to write a Business Plan and then approach investors to fund you.   In other words, you need to show investors how your organization plans to make money and how you are indeed qualified to lead such an organization.


How much does it cost to hire a CRO (contact research organization) for clinical trial recruitment?





Among the very few training institutes in Pune that offer clinical research courses, CRB Tech Solutions Pune offers real time and focused clinical research training program. Our program is designed to transform Life Sciences graduates into efficient professionals who will add value to the companies who hire them. Our training course includes theories , internship, and development of soft skills that will increase your chances of employment, way ahead of your contemporaries.

You might find a few institute of clinical research that provide clinical research training in Pune but the need to take the right decision and follow the right institute in making a bright career.

Eligibility Requirements
Any one of the following minimum qualifications is eligible:
MBBS, BDS, BAMS, BHMS, B.PHARM, B.Sc. (Life sciences, Biotech, Nursing), Post Graduate Diploma
Mode of training
Class room training
  • 4 Months Job oriented Internship Program
  • Training and Internship in CR & CDM
  • Access to live projects in Pune
ENROLLMENT
Offered twice a year.
Payment options:
With credit card & debit card, payment options for fees is flexible.
What sets up apart?
• 100 % placement guarantee on paper
• We offer LOI (conditional offer letter) from our clients
• Unlimited placement calls for both alumni and freshers
• Known for best walk-in drives.
• Placement with lifetime support.
• Mentoring by very talented corporate expertise faculties.
• Train in German language and hence enhance your abroad prospects.
• Personality development training which will benefit you in developing soft skills hat would help you in cracking interviews which are very important in standing up among other contemporary candidates in competitions.
• 95% practically oriented training sessions.


It depends on how hard it is to get the type of subject you're looking for. According to some estimates, recruiting can cost up to 30% of a trial budget. So, for a modest $25 million trial this can be millions of dollars in CRO fees.

There are tools that make make this easier for the sponsor to do this themselves, such as EHR / EMR data mining. John Halamka has a good blog on this, Life as a Healthcare CIO,
and we do too: Florence Healthcare Blog


How much does a clinical trial management system cost?




The question is how pharma R&D and clinical organizations control source data for local languages. This is currently one of the biggest issues facing clinical trial labelling and packaging.

At present, companies are struggling to find a reliable way to approve and lock down local language data – leading to the ever-present risk of products being incorrectly labelled, causing financial implications and risk to patient health.
Clinical trials are a global activity. As such, materials for clinical trial are now being shipped across many countries and many continents. Labelling, booklets and where necessary Instructions for Use (IFUs) must therefore be safely and accurately customized not only so that they are in the appropriate local languages, but also to ensure that the problems of those local languages are understood appropriately to communicate well with clinicians and patients. They must also abide by country specific needs; in certain countries additional information, such as the name of the trial organization or specific medication removal notices, has to be stated by law.
There is currently a huge degree of inconsistency in how organizations across the sector are approaching this important issue – some of which are prone to human error. Where companies have developed in-house processes, there are often a number of disparate systems involved in managing language, label/booklet design, approvals and final printing. Conversely, some organizations still rely on onerous manual processes – at great cost in terms of manpower and money.
As pharma companies fight to contain rising development costs, improve the efficiencies and higher ROI, integrated label lifecycle management could make a key contribution to some of the industry’s biggest operational goals.
The current scenario
The supply chain journey for clinical trials materials is very complex and variable. Treatments, that comprise various percentages and levels of a drug and placebo, are packaged to be distributed to clinical trial centres for eventual use with trial participants. The packaging and labelling are handled either by the pharma R&D organization itself, the clinical supplies company or a combination of the two. But, with clinical trials now being conducted on a global scale, the ultimate recipient may be located anywhere in the world.
The challenges
In a multi-country, multi-language clinical trial environment, tackling such a comprehensive range of variable data is a huge issue. To achieve the timely, safe and cost-efficient delivery of materials to a global user-base, companies face a number of challenges. Primarily, they must not only ensure that information is presented in the native language of its intended recipient, but they must also make sure that translations – most often from English into a local language – capture the subtleties and nuances of that local language.
In addition, there is also a large amount of local legislation and country-specific label designs. Currently, companies have various systems in place to manage this – some of which are very good – but few, if any, are joined up. As a consequence, pharmaceutical companies need to do more checks throughout the process – with cost implications in terms of time and expense

CTMS system cost totally depends on the vendor your select. average range of CTMS will cost you more than 10,000 dollars the enterprise version.

How do drug manufacturers select the right contract research organization(CRO)?

I am not sure about the selection criteria, but what I think is the reputation of research organization or the departmental heads in research organization play important role in getting contract.

What is the detailed cost breakdown of an expensive clinical trial?
I have read that clinical trials on humans cost millions. I'd like to learn where this money goes as that would help figure out ways of reducing this cost.




Adithya Balasubramanian

My entire answer to this question is from

http://www.manhattan-institute.o....

In 1975, the pharmaceuticals industry spent the equivalent of $100 million in today’s dollars for research and development of the average drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, according to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. By 1987, that figure had tripled, to $300 million. By 2005, this figure had more than quadrupled, to $1.3 billion.
The true amount that companies spend per drug approved is almost certainly even larger today. Matthew Herper of Forbes recently totaled R&D spending from the 12 leading pharmaceutical companies from 1997 to 2011, and found that they had spent $802 billion to gain approval for just 139 drugs: a staggering $5.8 billion per drug.
The biggest driver of this phenomenal increase has been the regulatory process governing Phase III clinical trials of new pharmaceuticals on human volunteers. One reason: Phase III clinical trials have become far larger and more complex than they were in the past. From 1999 to 2005, as the Tufts group has shown, the average length of a clinical trial increased by 70 percent; the average number of routine procedures per trial increased by 65 percent; and the average clinical trial staff work burden increased by 67 percent. On top of that, increasingly stringent enrollment criteria and trial protocols resulted in 21 percent fewer volunteers being admitted into trials and 30 percent more enrollees dropping out before completion of the tests.
Overall, Phase III trials now represent about 40 percent of pharmaceutical companies’ R&D expenditures. But this often-cited statistic actually understates the gravity of the burden. This is because overall R&D expenditures include all pharmaceutical candidates that a company tests—including hundreds that never reach the Phase III trial stage. When we confined our analysis to those drugs that actually get approved, we found that Phase III clinical trials typically represent90 percent or more of the cost of developing an individual drug all the way from laboratory to pharmacy.
In this paper, we look at four particular areas of public health concern: obesity; diabetes; stroke and heart ailments; and “orphan diseases” (ailments that afflict very small populations and hence lack the normal market incentives to develop treatments). We analyzed the progress of 12 major new pharmaceuticals developed across these four categories and found that in nearly every case, Phase III trials represented at least 90 percent of the entire cost of a drug’s development.

 This cost burden creates a system of perverse incentives for researchers and industry, which discourages the rational allocation of resources for drug development. After all, only one in 12 drugs that enter human clinical trials end up gaining approval from the FDA. This risk profile has led smaller companies to go bankrupt when they have faced setbacks in clinical studies. Many private investors are withdrawing venture capital support for start-up drug companies, fearing that their investments will vanish if there is the slightest hiccup in the development process.

 The consequences for Americans are higher-than-necessary health spending and poorer health outcomes. Pharmaceutical companies charge more for their products, in order to recoup their costly and risky investments. And fewer beneficial drugs reach doctors and patients.
What Is a Phase III Trial?
Federal law requires that medications proposed for human use go through “adequate and well-conducted clinical trials.” Around this statutory language, regulations and standardized practices have built a three-phase system for any compound that, having emerged from basic research and animal testing, is deemed a candidate for pharmaceutical use. These three stages (paid for, of course, by the medicine’s developer) begin with Phase I trials, involving perhaps 100 people at most, to assess the proposed drug’s safety and whether it works in treating a particular condition, symptom, or illness. If the medication “passes” these tests, it moves on to Phase II trials, which assess how well the drug works as well as how safe it is, and they involve a larger number of people (100–300).
Only after these stages does a drug candidate move on to Phase III trials, which test the drug against placebos, as well as currently available treatments, on thousands of people. The large sample size is essential to uncovering potential side effects that may affect small percentages of people and therefore may be missed in the smaller trials. Large-scale trials also protect against statistical accidents that often occur in small samples and thus provide a more complete and reliable portrait of the drug’s benefits and risks.
The importance of Phase III trials stems from the statutory language in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act. Under Section 505(d) of the act, sponsors of new drug applications must demonstrate “substantial evidence” of the drug’s clinical benefit, with “substantial evidence” being defined as “adequate and well-controlled investigations … by [qualified] experts.”
Under the FD&C Act, the FDA has considerable discretion to determine what constitutes “substantial evidence.” The agency has interpreted the plural form of the word “investigation” in the statute to mean that companies must sponsor at least two such studies, and those studies are usually large, multiyear Phase III trials—the ones that swallow up so much private capital. By tradition, each of these trials is expected to show, with 95 percent statistical certainty, that a drug meets its tested aims of clinical benefit.
Phase III Trials Are the Biggest Driver of the Rising Cost of Innovation
In order to more accurately estimate the contribution of Phase III studies to the cost of drug development, we reviewed public filings and records for companies developing medicines in four areas: GLP-1 inhibitors for diabetes; factor Xa inhibitors for cardiovascular disease; several new drugs for reducing obesity; and medications for several rare disorders such as Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
We calculated the number of patients studied in every clinical trial that the selected companies sponsored. We then cross-referenced these data with the average per-patient cost of clinical trials, as reported by a 2011 survey by the medical management consulting firm Cutting Edge Information. These are the data that show that, in most cases, companies spent more than 90 percent of their development money per drug on Phase III clinical trials. In the field of obesity, the average was 91 percent; in diabetes, it was 93 percent; in cardiology, it was 94 percent. Only among rare disorders were there exceptions to the general rule because in that field, some companies can take advantage of the FDA’s accelerated approval process and forgo Phase III studies.


http://www.manhattan-institute.o...
6.3k Views · 15 Upvotes · View Timeline
Darshan Kulkarni
There is no reasonable way to answer that question with specifics. Specific costs will vary based on the goal of the studies. Nevertheless, some of the costs may include: hiring a CRO, a CRO hiring sites both locally and globally, contract negotiators, statisticians, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, managers, CRAs etc. You are literally talking about hundreds to thousands of people that may be involved, each performing a specific task.
1.9k Views · 1 Upvote · View Timeline

Ryan Jones

That Manhattan group posted is pretty good. As a compliment this online book has the best overview I've seen: Discussion Paper

We have a summary of these costs issues in our latest post, too:
http://blog.florencehc.com/
1.2k Views · 1 Upvote · View Timeline

Raphael Miyashiro


I just want to bring a simple report  from EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations), wich states that it cost aproximately 1506  million dollars to bring a new chemical to the market (2012)

606 Views · 1 Upvote · View Timeline

Nicole Gomez

It depends upon what kind of trial research one wants to set up. If the goal provides long term results than it may cost more compare to the short term clinical trials that need to be conducted.
It is certainly not cheap to bring a new drug or treatment to market-- it can cost about $1.5 billion and takes 8 years on average. That being said, clinical trials also provide a significant economical and lifestyle benefit. In Alabama for instance, clinical trials and associated medical research have certainly become a significant part of the economy-- supporting more than 17,000 jobs! Here's a really interesting article that goes more in-depth on the subject: How Have Clinical Trials Improved Life in Alabama?

What's the average clinical trial startup time?
I define clinical trial startup as the process of identifying and activating clinical trial investigative sites, culminating in "first patient in"
You won’t believe it, but I’ve had studies where start-up lasted for more than a year for certain sites. This was due mostly to a highly ineffective LEC (IRB), long contract negotiation process and lack of involvement by the PI. Having mentioned these three key risks, you’d think the site wouldn’t be selected for participation, but then if the PI is a KOL, or there is a large patient population, all you can do is be upfront and transparent about risks and document every single contact. Usually, these sites either never get off the ground or finally have all approvals in place when recruitment is closed before they even have a chance to enroll their 1st patient.

I’ve also worked on a study where the start-up phase was 2 years. This was for an extremely rare indication in toddlers where the subjects were so rare they were brought in from other countries to participate. So in this case, protocol development, study logistics was 1 year and then review by ethics committee & organizing enrollment the 2nd year.


Six to nine months, depending on how quickly the sponsor can approve the contract and the consent wording, and whether or not the IRB requires a second full-board review.

depending on the trial size, the indication and the experience of the company running it.I would go with 6 months but it can easily spill into the 9-month frame for large Phase IIIs (although many sites will have been identified from Phase II)

A CRO may do all:
  • Epidemiological surveys
  • Clinical trials




Posted by at
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)